Home » Evangelism

Archives For Evangelism

The Tangible Kingdom: Creating Incarnational Community

Takeaway: If we want to reach people further away from the church, we need to change our methods.  At the very least we need to be around people far away from Christ.

Purchase Links: Hardcover, Kindle Edition

A friend of mine suggested this book.  His missions agency President has been influenced by the book and he wanted my feedback about the book.

In many ways these ideas have been bouncing around for at least the past decade.  Neil Cole‘s Organic Church (my review) treads some similar ground.  Essentially, the authors  are suggesting that the church is broken, or at least ill equipped as it is currently designed for reaching people that do not already have a relationship with the church.  The authors are not against current churches, in fact they think that current churches, especially the mega-churches really are doing a good job of reaching out to people that already have a relationship with the church.  (My church, a mega church, has people do a video before their baptism.  The videos and the baptisms keep the mission of reaching people front and center.  But most of the video begin with a variation of “I grew up in a loving Christian home, but…”).

The strength of Tangible Kingdom is the second half of the book.  In the second half, the authors relate their own story of reaching out to people by living life with them.  The key is that the authors fee they should not push people into short term decisions, but give them time to “sojourn” with them as they explore Christianity (and really more importantly, the people that claim Christianity.)  One story had a non-Christian woman leading a children’s ministry.  But the author sat with her weekly, went over the lesson, made sure she understood it and allowed her to teach it to the kids.  She got the message she was teaching the kids and became a Christian.

The way that we have time to live our lives with non-Christians is to be intentional about our third place.  Many Christians make their third place (the places they are most likely to spend time when not at home or work) the church.  When we make church our third place, our relationships primarily become with other church people.  The authors suggest that we should focus on spending time with people and allow our life to speak to other people’s needs.  They suggest this was Jesus’s method, “You’ll notice the majority of the stories happen in unplanned, interrupted moments. Most of Jesus’ teaching was done “along the way” or “as they were going.” What this means for us is that we must develop rhythms of sharing life so that these powerful moments can happen. If we only see ministry happening in our programmed world, according to our DayTimer, or in our church buildings, we’ll continue to miss out.”

Overall I thought this was a good contribution to the growing literature about reaching those that have no prior relationship with the church.  I thought some of the sociological descriptions at the beginning of the book were fairly weak.  Many others have done a better job trying to illustrate the differences between modern and post modern thinking.  But because this has been done so well by so many others, I don’t think it is a huge weakness because most people reading the book will have read others descriptions previously.

Back to the missions strategy, I do think that some variation of this strategy will have to be the future of the church both in the US and abroad.  (Although primarily done by nationals, not by missionaries.  I think missionaries will become more about training and mobilizing.)  Our traditional strategy of getting people into a church building to hear a presentation of the gospel in a large group setting is not going to work.  That being said, I think it will be a long transition and there is still lots of room for innovative traditional churches and innovative organic/missional/whatever term you want to use churches.

Takeaway: Statistics are important.  And if you are a Christian that believes in truth, you need to be even more careful with numbers.

I like numbers.  My day job is being a nanny, but my part time consulting job is evaluating an after school program.  I track grades, school attendance, program attendance, home and school visits, behavior, test scores, and a variety of other statistics.  In a previous life, one of my jobs was demographic research for church plants and I was statistician for a local Baptist association.  I was a sociology major as an undergrad and event went to a sociology paper competition (and came in 3rd) for a sociology paper about the relationship between believe in rape myths and matriculation in a Christian college campus.

If you know me in real life, then you have probably heard me quote a stat (or 50) about something or other.  So I should have jumped at this book.  But I did not.  Frankly, I am a bit negative about a lot of Christian’s use of numbers.  A couple weeks ago two different times in the same Sunday, from the pulpit and in a private meeting I heard a similar statistic about divorce that I knew was wrong.  My church is about 60 percent single adults.  So when people talk about marriage, I want it presented in a fairly positive light, not to be fake, but to not compound the negative feelings that many in my church have toward marriage.  So when I hear the same statistic about divorce rising, I get frustrated.  I did not say anything, but I was frustrated.  You see, divorce is not rising.  In fact it is dropping.  In part because many people are just choosing to not get married, or at least get married much later.  And divorce among highly educated, upper income people (like most everyone in my church) has fallen off a cliff.  So when we talk about divorce as being a major and increasing issue among Christians, we are actually wrong.  We should be providing support for marriages, that is why my wife and lead a small group for newly married couples.  And we should be providing support for those that facing or recently completed a divorce.  But in my church, telling people (most of whom are single) that divorce is increasing, does not really address either reality, or the issue most in the congregation are facing.

Christians Are Hate-Filled Hypocrites…and Other Lies You’ve Been Told: A Sociologist Shatters Myths From the Secular and Christian Media is a very good remedy to the many poorly presented statistics that are floating around in and outside the Christian world.  Dr Wright, spends a significant amount of time addressing why so many bad statistics are being used.  And really it comes down to two major areas, attention and authority.  We are trying to get people’s attention, so pastors (and many others) troll around for the worst statistics to try to prove their point.  (This is also why we get so many topical sermons that do not seem to fit the broader context of the passage.)  It is not that pastors (or others) are trying to mislead, but rather, they start from the end and find support instead.  The second major issue is that many people are misled because they saw something in print.  If it was printed, it must be true.  Christians, as people of the book, may be more influenced by the authority of something being in print.

Continue Reading…

Divine Commodity is a provocative book.  Probably the most provocative I have read since Flickering Pixels.  (I ended up writing five blog posts about Flickering Pixels because it was so provocative. This is the last post with links to the others.)

In many ways it is hard to argue with the basic idea that the church of modern America has been impacted by the growth of consumerism and the focus on the market economy.  I would think almost no one can disagree with that basic statement.  The question that I kept bumping up against was, “Ok, so we have been affected, but what does that mean?”

Jethani keeps suggesting that our churches have been broken by their interactions with culture.  This is where I kept wanting to argue.  I agree that many church have altered their programing to better serve the congregation (or potential congregation.)  But most of them have done that, not as a rejection of Christianity, but with a real belief that they can either redeem culture, or at least they can help redeem those within culture. Jethani reject the idea that we should be changing culture as a major focus of our job as the church.  He does not reject evangelism, but does suggest that the basic method of mass media evangelism is broken.

There are many radical suggestions, like rejecting web culture because it inherently weakens personal relationships, and rejecting most, if not all marketing within and outside the church.  I think that Jethani is playing with ideas.  He is intentionally being provocative, to make us really think about how we interact with culture and what the role of the church should be.

Like Flickering Pixels, the book is mostly redeemed for me in the last few pages.  I do think this is an important book.  The US church has been impacted by culture more than it has impacted culture.  But I am not sure that is not the way that Christ intends.  Regardless of where you come down, this is a book that will make you think.

_____________

I listened to this book as an audiobook and it was well presented.  It was also offered for free on Kindle two days after I bought the audiobook. So I picked up the Kindle version (it is now $9.99) as well, but I listened anyway.

Wednesday Unfashionable was introduced.  Today I am pulling out one particular issue that I think is import. (Part one of review)

Scripture and Truth

Tchividjian has a significant discussion on truth and scripture.  He starts by saying it is not so much the doctrine of scripture that we as Christians do not pay attention to, it is the reality of scripture.  We say we believe in inerrancy and suffiency of scripture, but then do not actually look to scripture for our daily life.  Churches (and pastors) often feed into this by becoming more like advice givers than bible preachers.  I am on-board with all of that.  But then he starts talking about sola scriptura and he looses me.  I just find the concept of sola scriptura as most Evangelicals teach disingenuous.  We do not actually believe in scripture alone.  Instead we believe in tradition and teaching about scripture that we do not write down into formal traditions.  And worse yet, we ignore the writings of Christians for hundreds years.  Scripture is about community and the Holy Spirit.  Anyone that is not reading scripture in the context of a church community and under the guiding of the Holy Spirit is not really reading scripture.  They may be reading the words on the page, but it is not the holy word of God. It is through reading scripture in the context of thousands of years of other Christians that we insure that our understanding remains orthodox.  And no matter how we try, we will always be influenced by our teachers, whether those teachers be the church fathers or our kindergarten Sunday School teachers.  So I do not understand his deviation into sola scriptura.

The next transition confuses me even more as he moves the discussion to truth being the foundation of community.  And while I don’t completely disagree with him he makes a cheap shot that I think illistrates where we would disagree as we worked this out in the real world.  He makes a crack against emergent church by claiming the “those that claim to be most interested community are the same that are most likely to reject truth. You cannot have community that is not based on trust and trust cannot occur unless you have truth.” (This is my paraphrase since I was listening on audiobook.)  I agree you need to have trust, but isn’t that trust based on love and grace?  If you are basing it on the other having truth as you understand it, then you will be disappointed every time.  No one can live up to those requirements.

He tries to illustrate his point by saying that Christians should be the most trustworthy people out there.  I agree with this section.   He talks about a used car salesman that he knows that said when he became a Christian he transitioned from trying to sell the best car, to selling the car that was right for the buyer.  He was trustworthy and people came back.  I fully agree with this idea, but I think we are using different concepts of truth and love.  In my mind, the used car salesperson is being loving and focusing on the needs of the other not on truth.  Yes he knows that God is the final arbiter of truth.  Yes he is being honest with the buyer, but that seems to be based on love and care for other other, not truth.  Most of the time when I hear Christians talking about truth they are talking about why the other is wrong, and doing it in a way that is not all that loving.

When Jesus talks about how we will be known as Christians he does not say, “You will be known by your truth.”  He says, “You will be known by your love for one another.”  Lots of people wield truth as a sword, cutting and hurting those around them.  At the same time some claim to be all about love, but then do not lovingly tell one another the truth.  So I want to reject the dichotomy that is being created between Truth and Love.  Truth has its most power when used in Love.  Love is most loving when Truth is told.   When when it comes down to it, Truth is not the verb, Love is the verb.  We are called to Love and be Love to one another.  We cannot Love without Truth, but the action is Love.

Overall recommendation

Overall this was a great book to stir up my thinking about how the church as an institution and myself as an individual should interact in culture.  I disagreed with a lot, but you often learn more from disagreements than from reading someone that you agree completely with.  What I appriciate is that with very minor exceptions, Tchividjian bent over backward to keep the kingdom as primary.  His writing was with a humble spirit and attempting to build up the church and not tear it down.  Highly recommend.

If you are going to buy it and are an Audible.com member, get it there, it is only $6.39 for members.  If you are not a member and want to try out the service it is only $9.99 for non-members.  If you don’t want to deal with the DRM from Audible you can get it on MP3 file from christianaudio for $12.98.  If you want to read it, it is $12.23 in hardback at Amazon or $9.99 for the Kindle version.

Unfashionable is not the book I thought I was getting.  And that is a good thing.  I picked it up in audiobook because it was just $6.36 at Audible.  I thought it would be ok.  What I had heard about it (which wasn’t much, I read an interview on Christianity Today with Tullian Tchividjian and followed the drama at his church last fall) made me think it was primarily a worldview book along the lines of Chuck Colson.

But it only took me a half page into Tim Keller’s introduction to realize I was wrong.  Keller started with the somewhat tongue in cheek characterization of Evangelicals.  He said that traditionally Evangelicals have thought that the world will be destroyed and since souls are the only thing that will survive that Evangelicals have tried to save as many souls as possible and have not paid attention to the rest.  But over the last generation that has changed as culture has moved further from Christianity.  Honestly, that is probably how some people do think of their faith.  That is not how Tchividjian thinks.

Universal Experience

One of the issues that this book brings up is the type of universal experience that many Christians want to place on other Christians.  Tchividjian has a clear conversion story.  And I think that story drives much of his ministry.  That is great, it give directions and creadibility.  But there are others that are not going to be attracted or reached by the type of ministry that Tchividjian is talking about.  That is why we have different types of churches and why the Holy Spirit tells one group to work on one type of ministry and other Christians to work on another type of ministry.

I had a lot of “Yes, but…” moments.  It is not really that I disagree with a lot (although there was some).  The problem is that in making his point, Tchividjian does not alway take the best of the thoughts of his opponents.  For example he spends a lot of time talking about the problems of chasing culture.  I totally agree that the Christian world will never be at the crest of culture.  We will always be on the backend and always a bit late.  But Tchividjian then makes the leap that what we are doing is trying to be as cool as culture.  Yes, there are some that are guilty of that.  But there are others that are trying to be as close to the front of culture as possible to remove as much of the cultural baggage as possible to the message of the gospel.  Yes, I agree that there are some issues with that method.  But what Tchividjian seems to attack are not the best attempts of the method, but the stragglers that do not really understand what they are doing.  Tchividjian will be charged by some as just trying to avoid culture or focus on tribalism.  That is not fair to Tchividjian attempts, which are much higher than that.

Cost of Christianity

One of the points that I think that Tchividjian is exactly right on I am going to rework.  We understand from economics that there is a cost for everything.  There is either the cost of the activity or the opportunity cost of not doing the activity.  We as Christians will never be able to complete on a level field with those that are not Christians.  Yes, we get benefit from our faith.  But we also invest in that faith.  We go to church, probably a small group, read scripture, pray, etc.  Making an arbitrary figure, say the average Christian spends 8 hours a week doing Christian activities.  That means that we must give something up.  Too many Christians have not learned the lesson of the modern Feminist, that one person really cannot do it all.  We cannot work 60 hours a week, be a good spouse and parent, witness to our neighbors, a church leader, and at the same time, work out at the gym, stay on top of a bunch of tv, blogs, movies, books, music, etc.  Something has to give.  Tchividjian is suggesting that it is more important to focus on being Christian than staying on the forefront of culture.  I totally agree with this.  I made the commitment to myself to read three books a week and post about it.  In result, I have dropped all my podcasts, a good bit of my rss reader, a lot of TV, I haven’t been to the gym regularly in months, etc.  We cannot do it all.

Important Work

Overall, I think this is an important work.  It not necessarily completely original.  But it is concise and readable.  And in the end for all that I disagree in some of the descriptions of why he suggests we do what we do as a church, when he gives illustrations of how that works out in reality, I agree almost every time.  He main point is that a working unified, different church is the most effective means of sharing the gospel, and I have nothing to disagree about that point.

On Friday I will have a second post about Tchividjian’s use of Scripture and Truth.  Some of it is great, some of it I take issues with, but working through the ideas is worth the time.

_____________

If you are going to buy it and are an Audible.com member, get it there, it is only $6.39 for members.  If you are not a member and want to try out the service it is only $9.99 for non-members.  If you don’t want to deal with the DRM from Audible you can get it on MP3 file from christianaudio for $12.98.  If you want to read it, it is $12.23 in hardback at Amazon or $9.99 for the Kindle version.

Takeaway: What is important about the church should be Jesus, not the structure.

Purchase Links: Hardback, Kindle Edition, Audible.com Audiobook, christianaudio.com Audiobook

“The world is interested in Jesus. It is his wife, the bride of Christ, that they do not want to spend time with.”

Neil Cole opens the book Organic Church with that provocative idea. I met Neil about the time that this book came out at a conference. I just got around to reading Organic Church (about five years later.) Since attending that Simple Church conference I have been intrigued by the concept of simple churches. At the time I was attending a small church of about 50. But my small church was anything but simple. Cole is practical, biblical and interested in making much of Jesus, to use Ed Stetzer‘s phrase. This is a rich book with a lot to think about. Some will be turned off because he is strong in his language about the weak and failing US church. But he is interested, not in condemning the Church, but making it stronger. Below are a variety of thoughts from the book. I listened to this on audiobook, so the quotes are my paraphrases.

Cole suggests that the Parable of the Sowers should give us encouragement to know that many (in the parable 2/3) of those that initially receive the gospel will not produce any fruit.  So I can spend my time on those that do produce fruit without guilt.  We have spent too much time accommodating those in the church that produce no fruit.

Later, Cole retells the story of Frog and Toad’s garden. Toad plants a garden, but it doesn’t grow as quickly as he thinks it should.  So he reads to it and sings to it and talks to it.  Eventually it grows but Toad is not sure that the garden is worth it.  He spent so much time working on it, he is not sure it is worth having a garden.  Cole’s point is that much of what we do as churches is similar to what Toad was doing.  It is the Holy Spirit that brings people to Christ and causes them to grow.  We have a responsibility to break up the soil, plant and harvest, but the actual growing, what we tend to spend a lot of time working on, is not our job.

Cole makes a lot of references to Jesus being what is important, not structure.  At one point he describes churches as being like the pipes in our house.  We never notice pipes unless they are clogged.  What we notice is how good the water is.  The water and getting it is what is important, not the pipes.

Cole also turn servant leadership on its head.  We all know Jesus told the disciples that the leader will be the servant.  And so we frequently hear from the pulpit and bible studies that leaders should be serving the rest of us.  But Cole thinks Jesus also meant it the other way.  People will follow those that they see serving.  If leaders need to be reminded and told to serve, then they aren’t worth following.  Find someone that is serving and follow them instead.

Cole spends a significant amount to time talking about releasing new Christians to work.  He, quite rightly in my mind, complains about the mentality that people should be trained before sharing the gospel with others.  The majority of Christians in the US feel inadequate in sharing the gospel.  But Christians in the US are the most trained and equip Christians in history.  Few Christians have less than a handful of bibles.  Many have attended church their whole lives.  But poorly educated new Christians around the world start churches and reach people.  He asserts, and I mostly agree, the big issues is obedience.  US Christians are trained beyond their obedience.  Much better to have obedience beyond your training.  The Holy Spirit is the one doing the work anyway.  The part I don’t agree with, or really I think he just needs to be explicit about it, is that part of the reason that US Christians are trained beyond their obedience lies in the training.  We tend to train people by talking to them, not bringing them alongside while we do the work of sharing the gospel.  If trainers took one person and walked with them and mentored them in sharing the gospel and then took another person and did the same.  I think we could reach a lot more people than we do by filling huge ballrooms at evangelism conferences where we talk about sharing the gospel.  Cole does this, and I think more than the style of or method of simple church, his emphasis on discipleship and practical equipping is what makes his movement successful.

Overall I think this is a great book. My only complaint is that I think it could use a bit of editing. It is only 272 pages on paper, but I think it could have had 50 pages cut and still provided the same amount of punch.  Many people want to condemn Cole and others like him for rejecting the church.  That is just not fair, Cole loves the church.  But Cole is called to reach people that the church is not reaching, and he is doing it.  We should never just reject people that are successfully following the direction of the Holy Spirit because the Holy Spirit is not directing us in the same direction.