Home » Thomas Nelson

Archives For Thomas Nelson

Intimacy With The AlmightyTakeaway: The urgent often detracts from the real relationships in our lives. Intimacy with God or others takes time and attention.

Purchase Links: Hardcover, Paperback

Last night was the last in a four week small group study of this book.  It was a useful book to discuss.  We are all busy and stressed in the modern world and the reminder to actively seek solitude, silence, simplicity and surrender.  It is always hard to separate a group’s discussion from the book, but the book led to a good group discussion.

Intimacy with the Almighty (Insight for Living Bible Study Guides)

One of the odd things about this book, that you really need to know if you are going to order it, is that there are two different versions of the book.  The hardcover, right, is an 80 page small format book (Prayer of Jabez style gift hardcover.)  It was published in 2000 by Thomas Nelson.  The paperback, above, is about 30 pages of content, published in 1996 by Word Publishing.  My best guess is that the paperback was written as a group study (it has questions and places to write in the book), then Charles Swindoll was asked to re-write the book to go in the gift book style format and the book was re-released with the same title and marketed to individuals.

I read both, because we ordered the hardcover (used) to read before the group, then ordered the paperbacks for the rest of the group, thinking I would save some money.  But the books are completely different.  The paperback has four chapters, one is an introduction, then three chapters that deal with the four different principles.  The hardcover has a different introduction, then a discussion of Paul and how he pursued God.  Then one long chapter that deals with the four disciplines and a conclusion.  The rough content is the same.  But the order is different, the presentation is different.

As a group study, the paperback is better.  It is shorter and gets directly to the meat of the subject while giving questions.  If you are reading it by yourself, then the hardcover is probably better because there is more to it.

Overall, I recommend it as a group study, but I think it is probably too short as an individual book.  There are other books that deal with the pursuit of God more fully.  Just make sure you order the one you actually want.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sabbath: The Ancient PracticesTakeaway: Sabbath should be about delight in God and pretend play to discover how to risk for Christ.  Best book on Sabbath I have read, best book in the Ancient Practice series by far.

Purchase Links: Hardback, Paperback, Kindle Edition (Hardback is more than $2 cheaper than other two right now)

The introduction of the book opens with an attempt to move us away from thinking of Sabbath in a untilitarian (it is good for us) or vacation (get away from it all and relax) and toward a focus on delight.  The introduction ends with:

“The way to make use of this book from the beginning is to ask the simplest question: what would I do for a twenty-four-hour period of time if the only criteria was to pursue my deepest joy?”

Dan Allender clearly wants us to alter our thinking away from “being quiet, reading the Bible, praying and thinking about God” as students in one of his classes suggested were the appropriate activities for Sabbath.  Instead the books is mostly organized around the idea of play.

Allender quotes Diane Ackerman about the origin of the word play, “plegan (the word for play) meant to risk, chance, expose oneself to hazard.”  Allender suggests that Sabbath should be the height of true play, meaning risky.  This starts a very good section on why play is important to the Sabbath.  But the most interesting to me was the comment and question as the end of the section. “Here is the key: we will one day be seated…and celebrate the Crucified and Risen One with abandon and delight.  How might this day, then be our opportunity to pretend righteously?”

This is not a perscriptive book, but it is also not vague.  There are many examples of how Allender works through his attempts at celebrating the Sabbath.  And they are not just storied, but told in a way to illistrate the principles behind how we should be celebrating Sabbath.

Early in the book, Allendar asks how we justify the fact that only one of the commandments to we feel justified in breaking regularly.  I think it is a good question.  I know many will cite Christ’s quote, that the Sabbath was made for us and not us for the Sabbath or some other similar variation.  But I do not believe that Jesus meant it is fine to ignore the Sabbath.  Instead, he was holding the Pharisees to a higher standard that they were willing to submit to.

For me this was a perfect example of what the Ancient Practice Series should be all about.  I have now read six of the eight books in the series and this was far and away the best of the series.  I have appriciated several of the books, especially Fasting and In Constant Prayer.  But the series as a whole is a very mixed bag.

My reviews of the other Ancient Practice Books

Fasting by Scot McKnight
In Constant Prayer by Robert Benson
Tithing by Douglas LeBlanc
The Sacred Meal by Nora Gallagher
The Liturgical Year by Joan Chittister

____________
I received a copy of this book from the publisher for purposes of review.  I gave my copy to one of the people responsible for planning worship at my Church.  

Cover of "Plan B: What Do You Do When God...

Cover via Amazon

 

Takeaway: Our plans for ourselves do not always work out.  God can still work in our lives for his own glory, even we do not have the answers to our why questions.

Purchase links: Paperback, Kindle Edition

I have been meaning to read Plan B for quite a while. I recieved a copy as part of my Catalyst Experience pack earlier this year and it was put into my To Be Read pile.  I knew that when the book originally came out, instead of having time to promote the book Pastor Pete Wilson was dealing with an historic flood in his hometown of Nashville.  During the week that the book came out 40 families in the church and hundreds of other families in the community had significant flood damage.  Cross Point Church helped clean 400 homes and mobilize more than 2000 separate volunteers during the first week after the flood.

While I think it is unlikely that he would have chosen the flood as a publicity tool, the fact that he had scraped his plans for book promotion and worked on the flood, probably ended up with more promotion than he would have had originally.

I thought the book started a bit slow.  It over and over showed how people do not get what they originally wanted for themselves.  Intrinsically, we all know that.  As much as we make plans, we know people that did everything right, made the plans, did the work and still had things go badly.

By chapter 10 there was a turning point for me.  The book became more cross focused.  Wilson used the example of his kids’ love of fruit snacks.  We all know that fruit snacks are a treat, not a food group.  God wants for us what is healthy, not just the snack.  In Exodus, God offered Moses success leading the people.  But during and exchange in Exodus 33, Moses resists success if it means that he does not have God.  That for me is the turning point.  If we are after our plan A instead of God, then we will never be satisfied.

Later in the book Wilson quotes Mark Batterson: “I tend to live the way I drive. I want to get from point A to point B in the shortest amount of time and by the easiest rout possible. But I’ve come to realize that getting where God wants me to go isn’t nearly as important as becoming who God wants me to be in the process. And God seems to be far less concerned with where I’m going than who I’m becoming.”  This really is the point of the book.  Wilson wants us to understand that we all feel hurt when things do not go according to plan.  And we may not ever be able to explain why something happened the way it did, but God’s focus in on moving us through the process, not on the goals that we are focused on.

I am increasingly concerned that we as a Christian church are more interested in right belief than in transformation.  The importance of this book is that Pete Wilson does not think that right belief will solve our problems.  Only trusting in God and learning to depend on him in our weakness will really lead to transformation.

This is not a 5 steps to dealing with your problems book.  Much like Anne Jackson’s Permission to Speak Freely (my review), it ends without a nice little bow.  We will not always get what we want, that does not mean God does not love us. God loves us, so he will walk with us through the disappointment.

Here is the video trailer to get a good idea of the focus of the book.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Permission to Speak Freely: Essays and Art on Fear, Confession, and GraceI am not sure when I stumbled across Anne Jackson‘s blog.  It has been several years now.  And while I am not an every day reader, it is in my Google Reader and I usually at least glance at it.  As much as Anne’s writing, her sense of purpose and her desire to do something with her writer’s platform (other than sell books) has keep me reading.

Anne rode a bike across the country to raise money for Clean Water this past summer (less than a year after having heart surgery).  In November, she is leading a second trip back to Haiti to work and raise awareness of the continuing need there.  What really shows me how much her vision for serving people has made a difference is that an Atheist blogger has issued a challenge that he (and other Atheists) can raise more money to help Haiti than the Christians on her blog.  All in good fun, the fact that she can have fun with an Atheist to see who can raise more money for relief in Haiti shows that she is really about reaching out to people.  I can respect that.

Permission to Speak Freely is a short book (less than 200 pages and only 3 hours on audio.)  But it has real heart to bring healing to the people that have been hurt by the church’s attempt at prettying itself up.  This is Anne’s second book.  Her first, on overcoming burnout in ministry (was among my top 11 non-fiction books last year.)

The first half of Permission to Speak Freely is Anne’s story.  It is not a pretty story.  She is a pastor’s kid who’s family was was brutalized by the church, she was later molested by a youth pastor and then rolled over by churches (and church staff) that did not have time for dealing with the hurts of real people.  It is a gripping and tragic story.

The second part of the book essentially deals with topical treatments of the things that the church does not like to deal with.  Again primarily, but not completely, told through Anne’s story.  Significant areas are porn, sex and other addictions, depression, abuse at the hands of others, etc.  Each of these areas are dealt with honestly, but without the flashiness that sometimes accompanies “tell all” salvation stories.

The focus is not on the sin, but on the working through those areas of sin in order to heal.

What I like about the focus is that Anne is primarily about helping both the person that is in need of healing and the church.  This is not about condemnation of the church (although there is frustration) but about helping the church see that its role is about loving the other, because in the end we are all the other.  (Our sin makes us “the other” from God.)

I grew up in a good home, was not abused, did not dabble in drugs or alcohol, have sex before marriage, etc.  So by many estimations, I am on the right track in my Christianity.  Anne counters this idea by saying that we all have our issues at some point in time.  If we do not create church to be a safe place for hurt people to come, then we are not being the church that Christ wants us to be.  If I only want to deal with people from nice suburban homes that have it together, I will miss out of the strength of the church, its ability to heal and change people through the power of Christ.

An important idea is that the church, and we as individuals, need to give others the benefit of going second.  Being first is hard, but when you see someone else go first, it make going second (and third and fourth) easier.  If church is a place where we can safely confess our sins (and the sins done against us) then it makes it easier for others to come forward later.  Which not only helps us fulfill the role of the church in the world, but also makes it easier for us to come forward in the future when we later have another issue.  Anne is clear that issues do not die quickly.  Sin is still in our lives because we are sinful people.  But in community sin looses much of its power to shame and harm.

This is not a __ step book.  She does not give four steps to confessing our sin, or five steps to forgiving those that hurt us.  Instead this book is about giving stories of how others are moving forward so that we can be encouraged to move forward under the grace of God as well.

I am adding this to my list of Read Again books.  As much as it may sound like a self help book, it is primarily a story that can be used to help us work on our own story.  Again, Permission to Speak Freely meets my desire to find books that do more than give knowledge.  This book prods me to action, to use the knowledge I already have to move closer to Christ and to help others move closer too.

I listened to this on audiobook (the book was provided free from christianaudio for review) and Anne narrated.  I have said many times I like listening to authors read their books.  This is an example of why I think it is so important.  No one else could have read this like she did.

Purchase Links: Paperback, Kindle Edition, Audible.com Audiobook

I am not a huge fan of apologetics.  So is is a bit odd that I picked this book to read and review.  I am not trying to be disingenuous, but rather I hoped that the focus would be on the subtitle “Living the Faith We Defend“.  But this book still started with some of the assumptions that I dislike about the general field of apologetics.  In the introduction Ravi Zacharais tries to introduce the purpose, but only succeeds in marginalizing an important part the the audience.   He asserts that we are “fashioned by God to be thinking and emotional creatues.  The emotions should follow reason, and not the other way around.”  But it is unclear to me why he would start with that assumption.  Aren’t some drawn to God because of emotional issues?  And some drawn by intellectual issues?  The correct response would seem to be to address those with emotional issues with emotional responce and those with intellettual issues with an intellectual response.  But as Zacharias points out just a few pages later, the intellectual issues may hide a deeper emotional issue or vise versa.  A complete person is made up of both emotion and intellect, it is not possible, or even desirable, to separate the two.  Christianity should encourage a view humans as complete, not broken pieces.

The second issue I have with apologetics is that most of the time it minimizes the actual issues that it brings up or does not actually present the questions fairly.  Just pages into the first chapter, Amy Orr-Ewing tries to dismiss Foucault’s isssues with knowledge and power by just asserting that if Foucault really believed his own ideas then he should have just kept quiet so he would not assert his power over anyone.  This completely misses Foucault’s point.  He was not asserting that we should not have ideas so that we do not assert power, but that the very act of having an idea is a form of power.  We as Christians believe this.  That is the root of apologetics.  We believe that the words and ideas of scripture, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, can change people.  The ability to change someone with an idea is the very definition of power.

It continues on so that by page 10, the author has tried to show that we can find the objective historical truth of long distant events, that we can know the permanent significant idea of words and that she has solved the problems of the cannon and many gnostic gospels.  Of course I am being a bit facetious here.  But thoughtful Christian philosophers have spent entire careers dealing with just parts of one of these ideas.  Of course a book like this cannot adequately deal with all the ramifications of these ideas.  But a book like this that attempts to use “real integrity” (as it says it is doing) should admit that there really are issue to be dealt with and 10 pages is barely enough space to introduced them, let alone adequately address them.

All I have done at this point is finish the first chapter.  Each chapter is written by a different member of Ravi Zaharias International Ministries or people that have taught with them.  According to the back cover, Ravi Zacharias decided that this book needed to be written when he “was…sharing his faith with a Hindu when the man asked: “If the Christian faith is truly supernatural, why is it not more evident in the lives of so many Christians I know?” The question hit hard, and this book is an answer.  Its purpose is to equip Christians everywhere to simultaneously defend the faith and be transformed by it into people of compassion.”  I hope that is really what the rest of the book is about.

____________________

Beyond Opinion was provided by the publisher for the purpose of review.  The book will be given away when I have finished the review.

Takeaway: The first popular biography of Bonhoeffer. Not perfect, but well worth reading.

Purchase Links: Hardcover, Paperback, Kindle Edition, Audible.com Audiobook

Like many Evangelicals I have been a fan of Bonhoeffer’s writing for many years.  I have read Cost of Discipleship, Life Together and the two collections Letters and Papers from Prison and Love Letters from Cell 92.  More than the rest the Love Letters book really made him a real person, and not just writer.  A couple years ago I also saw Bonhoeffer, a great film documentary (streamable on netflix) that did a great job introducing Bonhoeffer, but none of these comes anywhere close to the depth that Eric Metaxas’ new biography has.

This biography was a whole new view of Bonhoeffer.  I knew he was a great theologian.  I knew he served as a pastor and underground seminary leader, I knew he had written some of the most challenging works of the 20th century, I knew he was executed days before the end of World War II.  I did not understand the extent of his involvement in the plot to assassinate Hitler, or how many attempts there were, or how long the planning went on.

I also did not know much he worked to keep a practical, pastoral focus to his theology, not just an academic focus.  He served as a pastor in Spain, London, and a variety of places in Germany.  This is in spite of the fact that many of his own family did not approve of theology, let alone being a pastor as a viable career choice.  His family was among the top rungs of intellectual society in Germany.  His brother worked with Albert Einstein before Einstein left Germany.  His father was among the most celebrated psychiatrist/neurologists in Germany (primarily as an academic study).

This is not a perfect biography.  There are some editing errors.  (Albert Einstein is referred to as Alfred.)  But more distracting are what I would call the “Dan Rather” style descriptions.  This is one of many, many examples, “The RSHA was led by the waxy lamprey Reinhard Heydrick, who worked directly under Himmler.”  Now I know what Metaxas meant, but I think the folksy descriptions detract from the story and otherwise very well written biography.

More than anything I think that Metaxas worked to keep Bonhoeffer out of the boxes that many people want to put him in.  Bonhoeffer was not simply an academic theologian, he was not simply against Hitler, he was much more than just a martyr or saint.  He was a man of God, that strived to do what he believed that God would have for him.  I highly recommend this biography.

Second Opinion from Christianity Today.

__________

This book has generated a significant amount of controversy.  Here is a link to a review that summaries some of the controversy and deal with them in a very balanced way.  After reading a number of reviews from people more familiar with Bonhoeffer studies, I am less inclined to highly recommend this biography.  I still think it is worth reading.  And there is not another popular biography of Bonhoeffer available.  But if you do read it you should know that many Bonhoeffer scholars are quite negative about the accuracy of both Metaxas’s take on German history and on Bonhoeffer’s theology.

__________

Disclosure: I received a free copy of this book from the publisher with the understanding that I would review the book here.  I gave the book away to a man on a plane that was very interested in Bonhoeffer.  He had been introduced to Bonhoeffer by a secular Jewish man that really liked the book Cost of Discipleship.

BOOKWI.SE REVIEWS OF BOOKS BY OR ABOUT DIETRICH BONHOEFFER

Cover of "The Divine Hours: Prayers for S...

Cover via Amazon

Takeaway: Fixed hour prayer is a great way to focus on God throughout the day, but hard to do in a modern, busy world.

Purchase Links: HardbackPaperbackKindle Edition

For the past couple months I have been trying to do fixed hour prayers.  The Divine Hours: Prayers for Summertime is part of a four book series by Phyllis Tickle of fixed hour prayers.  There are four entries a day, Morning, Afternoon, Evening and Night.  The prayers are a good mix of modern and historic prayers, psalms and other scripture readings and hymns.

I have not participated in fixed hour prayers before, but after reading In Constant Prayer (my review) I thought I should try it.  I can see real value in stopping throughout the day and concentrating on God.  I am a low church guy.  I have no real back ground in liturgy, the church year, fasting, etc.  That is one reason I have been interested in the Ancient Practice Series from Thomas Nelson to try and find some relationship to the historic and modern global church.  I have found that when I do the fixed hour prayers, whether I am in the mood to worship and pray or not, I almost always am caught up in reverence and worship.  It is not uncommon for me to really not be paying much attention as I walk through it and still by caught up in worship.  Keeping the schedule is hard.  I am usually OK with the morning and night, but the afternoon is hard.  I am a nanny for a 1 year old and a 2 1/2 year old.  I am a part time consultant for non-profits.  I try to keep up with this blog.  I rarely participate in the afternoon session.  And for some strange formatting decision the night prayers are completely separate from the other three set of prayers so I often do the evening at night and then never do the actual night prayers.

That brings me to formating.  I am reading this on a kindle.  I think that the kindle is a great format for fixed hour prayers.  The kindle never looses your place, the prayer book can be as long and detailed as you want.  It can be carried with you and you do not have to shout that you are doing fixed hour prayers.  But this book was not designed for kindle.  The hymns are the worst.  There is often two verses written side by side instead of just formated straight down the page.  And the night prayers being separate from the rest of the prayers is impossible to use.  The other problem is that this is the only one of the four books that has been converted to kindle format.  So my only option is to try to find another book of fixed hour prayers or just keep doing this one throughout the year.  I have been looking and I have not found another better option.  The others prayer books that I have seen have even worse formating and often require jumping all over the book to complete a set of prayers.  There is a real need for someone to write or compile a set of prayers for ebook.   So I will probably keep using this one.  In spite of the formatting issues and my lack of consistency, the value of the fixed hour prayers is much greater than any minor inconveniences.

When I agreed to review this book I was specifically thinking of a friend that had asked me for a recommendation for a Chronological bible earlier this year.  I knew that such bibles existed but I had not read one.  So I was not really sure what to expect.  I knew this was not a bible, but a background book to be read along with the bible.

Once I received the Chronological Guide to the Bible I had a couple of concerns right off the bat.  First, I am concerned with the idea of a chronological bible.  Not because I do not think that background knowledge of scripture is important, because I do.  And not because I am concerned with changing around the order of scripture, because I am fine with that.  I am concerned because the concept of a Chronological bible tries to place a modern idea of history on scripture, which was not written as a modern history book.  I am pleased that throughout the book the authors repeatedly made the point that the bible was not history.  But the concept of bible as history is repeated even more.  The introduction has a very good background on why different decisions were made about the order.  But the summary on much of the decisions was that we have an educated idea, but then we have to guess.

My second concern is with the way this particular book is put together.  It is a very ADD format.  It is full color and is put together like a fancy magazine.  There are many, many short little articles to give background and history to the scripture that should be read along with the scripture.  I did not read along with scripture and my guess is that most others will not either.  I think much of the time it will be read more like an encyclopedia than a commentary.  The problem is that because of its structure you will probably randomly flip through it rather than move through it in a structured way, which defeats the purpose.

I have a kindle and I wonder why this could not be put together in a cleaner format, with a bible to be read straight through.  If formated for an ebook reader, you would not have to worry about the size of the book (a bible and the commentary in Chronological Guide would be fairly large.)    The benefit of this format is that it can be used with any bible.  As much of an inroad as ebook readers have made in the last couple years, they are still only about 3 to 5% of the book market.

Overall, this is probably a good idea to try once.  One year read through the bible Chronologically, but you can do that with a free online reading guide.  Summary review: go look at it in a book store.  And think about how you are going to use it before you buy it.

__________________________

Disclosure: This book was provided free for purposes of review.  It was passed on to a missionary friend that was looking for a Chronological Bible.

Tithing can be a tricky topic in some crowds. I have never really understood why it is such a taboo subject. Maybe it is because I am a pastor’s kid, maybe it is because it was never really a question whether you gave or not. So I guess I do not really understand the trepidation that many people have when dealing with Tithing.

Tithing is part of the The Ancient Practice Series, of which Tithing is the fifth book that I have reviewed.  These books are all completelydifferent in tone from one another.  This book is described by the author as a journalistic survey of tithing from a variety of sources.  So the author interviews people from a variety of mostly Christian backgrounds (there is one Orthodox Jewish Rabbi as well.)

This is certainly one way to get a variety of perspectives about tithing but it does not get at any of the hard questions or issues that I have. There is an assumption that the tithe, at least the majority, goes to the local church. But there is never a discussion about why, in an age of weak denominations, poor giving to international missions and strong para-church organization, about why tithe should go to the local church. (Personally, I give almost nothing to my local church and have not for most of my adult life. I have always attended local churches that have had plenty of resources, while having a number of friends that raise their own support for local or international missions. I also believe that the tithe as instituted in both the Old and New Testament was to be used in significant portion to serve the poor.)

Another issue that is not addressed is US Christians’ very poor participation in the tithe. Even if you think of the tithe as completely voluntary and not attached to a 10 percent amount, very, very few Christians participate in a meaningful way.  The average Christian in the US gives less than 3 percent to all causes, Christian and secular combined.  There is one really good quote from the Ronsvalles (Empty Tomb Inc), “If I am not trusting God with my money, am I really trusting him with my eternal salvation?”

The final big issue in my mind that was not adequately addressed is dependence on God.  The above quote hints at it.  But in the US, almost no one is really destitute.  There is poverty, but only a few really worry about where there next meal is coming from.  So when we give, it is almost always out of plenty, not out of poverty.  How does this affect how we give?

Tithing, like all of the other books in the series except for a small portion of Scot McKnight’s book Fasting, has virtually no real history of the practice. So it does not really meet the task of introducing the reader to the Ancient Practice, but rather casually surveys the modern practice.

This was far from a bad book. It was brief (I read it during one of my nieces long naps). And it was well written. It just did not address any of the questions that I think should be addressed when talking about the tithe.

UPDATE: Others have had a very different take.  Books and Culture Magazine said it “is one of the best on the subject that I have seen.”  Here is a podcast from the Books and Culture editors talking about it. http://blog.christianitytoday.com/podcasts/upload/tithing.mp3
_______________

Disclosure: This book was provided free by Thomas Nelson for review purposes. It was donated to a pastor doing research.

Cover of "The Hole in Our Gospel: What do...

Cover via Amazon

Takeaway: There is a difference between the Gospel and the ramifications of the Gospel.  This book is about the ramification of recieving the gospel without acting on the Gospel.

Purchase Links: Hardcover, Paperback, Kindle Edition, Audible.com Audiobook

I have been sponsoring a child through World Vision for about a decade or so.  We are on our second child because the first aged out of the system.  I remember reading about the founding of World Vision when I was in college.  But after listening to the Hole in Our Gospel I have never been prouder to support World Vision.  I have several acquaintances that have worked for World Vision and I have always been impressed with their vision and dedication to their work.

If you have not read The Hole in Our Gospel, you need to stop and go buy it now.  Seriously, it is that good.  The basic thesis (told through his own biography) is summed up in a quote from Rich Stearns’ former pastors, “It is not what you believe that counts, it is what you believe enough to do, that counts.”  I think that this effectively counters all of the complaints about “social gospel” and “faith not works”.  Richard Stearns never questions the role of faith in Christianity, he strongly supports it.  Instead he questions the role of an incomplete faith that has no room for works.  If we are not changed by our faith, then is it really faith?  Have we really submitted to Christ our lives?  Are we really a Christian if our lives are just like those around us?  Are we really following the words of God (that speak throughout the scripture about the need to care for those that are poor, orphaned and widowed).

He spends most of the first half of the book either giving reason for why we as Christians should care for the poor, or convincing us that the poor really need cared for.  But right about the half way point he shifts the focus to a more positive one.  Giving us stories of how the poor are being helped.  He speaks about where the church (both universal and local) are not doing all they could or should be doing, but that critisims is done with love, and from a position firmly rooted within the church.

Stearns’ criticism of the church is summarized by some research that World Vision commissioned.  Local churches were asked to pick the three main focuses of their church from a list that was provided.  Only 18 percent of churches picked “working with the poor and destitute”.  Overall the top three were Worship, Discipleship and Evangelism.  These are all three important, and it maybe that many churches would have put working with poor as number 4, or maybe they view working with poor as part of Worship, Evangelism or Discipleship.  But having grown up in the church, and attending a very good church now (which I think would put “working with poor” at about 6 or 7 in priority) I think that Stearns is right when he says at least part of the problem is an honest lack of understanding.

However, a lack of understanding does not explain it all.  Before World Vision started a major campaign to expand its work with children orphaned by AIDS in Africa, it commissioned another study to evaluate Evangelicals attitudes about AIDS (this was in the mid-1990s.)  When asked if you would consider donating to a respected Christian organization that wanted to help children orphaned by AIDS only 3% said they would definitely consider it.  58% said they would definitely not consider it.  The smallest proportion of any group (including non-Christians, Atheists, mainline Christians and Catholics).  Esentially Stearns ask the question that Donald Miller, Andy Stanley and a variety of others keeps asking lately, “What story do you want told about you when it comes time for your children to ask you how you responded?”  We know how we feel about our parents, grand-parents and others that did not fall on the right side of civil rights, apartheid, and slavery.

This really is a book that you should read and read soon.

_______

FTC Disclosure: I was supposed to get a free copy of this book from Thomas Nelson to participate in their Blogger Program, but they ran out of copies before mine was sent.  I went ahead and reviewed it with them, but I paid for my copy.  It was purchased at Audible.com.  The links above to Amazon are affiliate links.