Takeaway: If you are going to respond to another author, it is best to deal with their actual arguments.
GK Beale opens the book with a fictional discussion between two Evangelicals. This fictional discussion was one of the better parts of the book. It actually took both the conservative and more moderate evangelical students seriously.
Beale is directly responding to Peter Enns’ Inspiration and Incarnation. I was interested in reading a good conservative response to Enns. It is not that I think that Enns’ book was perfect, it was far from it. But Beale’s problems with Enns’ book seem to rely less on the evidence that Enns’ presents than on the defense of what Beale views as an Evangelical view of inerrancy and the doctrine of scripture.